The pope wants Ukraine to surrender. That would give Russia a green light for endless war | Nathalie Tocci | The Guardian


Pope Francis’s anti-western views are well known – and his new advice would lead not to peace, but a dangerous escalation, says Guardian Europe columnist Nathalie Tocci

============================================

This all shows how unknowledgeable Pope Francis is or is he trying to save the Catholic Church for when Putin eventually invades Italy and forces the Catholic Church to become Russian Orthodox Church for if Putin is allowed to go on unchecked then this is a very probable outcome. But Catholism will by then be much less as Putin will have already have removed the Catholic Church in all the other countries he has taken over before getting to Italy.

If Pope Francis feels that Putin can be trusted then he is not in the real World for Putin can never be trusted.

If Ukraine does or has to surrender or defeated then there will be no Ukraine, except, perhaps in name only, if even that, for it will be within Russia as will any other countries Putin takes over.

The Pope is either foolish in his beliefs or he has already been taken over by Putin, which if so is not good for Catholism.

The church in any country getting involved in politics is never good and why Church of England Bishops and others should not have automatic access to the House of Lords, if it is to be retained, which more than likely it will not be. But then the House of Commons is also a waste of space.

Unfortunately, the policial systems in any country are very far from good with some being far worse than others. In virtually every aspect the political systems are there for those inside politics and not the population which they should be as all political systems are corrupt to some degree, with many more so than others.

Source: The pope wants Ukraine to surrender. That would give Russia a green light for endless war | Nathalie Tocci | The Guardian

American living in UK disgusted by portion sizes – and crumpets – Mirror Online


An American has shared some of the things that disgusted her most since moving to the UK. It’s been quite the culture shock, and some of the most baffling things to her have been crumpets and Nando’s

============================================

There is no country in the World that would be acceptable to everyone for we all consider different aspects to be our ideals.

But in the UK at least we a free to express our opinions unlike in America where you could be shot for doing so or sued. Either way the legal profession makes a great deal of money from it in America.

The food in the UK may not be to everyones taste, but at least in virtually every part of the UK you have vast choices of what food is available and we have laws that ensure the food is not only edible but is to a large extent health to eat, unless you do eat too much and over eating is not healthy at all.

In the UK and most other countries outside of America there are strict laws on how food is produced, especially meat of all natures. So, our chickens don’t have to be cleaned with chlorine and other meats are not injected by various hormones and other substances to improve some of the tastes and apperance. Many of these additives not adding to the continued good health of persons who consume the products.

As to portion sizes we are not forced to over eat and in doing so we are not as overweight as many are in America, b ut we do have overweight problems, perhaps due to some elements of the costs related to living and standing in Society.

In most instances we are free to walk wherver we wish to, so a vehicle is not normally required just to go comparable short distances. Unlike America where you are in many instances not allowed to walk unless instructed to do so.

Politics is never a good area in any country and we do have our own problems with some politicians, but not to the extent of in America.

Yes, we have the NHS which, while it could be a great deal better, it is for all its faults much better than the American healthcare system as we know that eventually we will be seen in the NHS and being seen and receiving treatment is down to healthcare professions and not non-healthcare professionals such as prfit making insurance establishments. So we will not be refused treatment or go bankcrupt for needing healthcare.

We do have some problems with our legal authorities, especially with regards to some in our police forces, but at least we know that in most instances no one will be shot and killed just by engaging with the police. Unlike America where it is shoot first and then maybe ask questions later assuming the person is still alive, just for some routine stops and not major crime.

Even going to America you are made to feel unwelcome as for some reason the Border forces assume you are coming to work and stay rather than just coming for a few weeks holidays.

Then we have shopping, as in the UK and most other countries outside of America the goods you wish to purchase will be priced with the amount you will be paying, unlike America when the price shown will be increased b y unknown amounts when you are ready to make the purchase.

In the Uk we do have some discrimination problems, even though we do have laws to restrict discrimination, but in America it appears that discrimination is apparently a national hobby.

If anyone comes to the UK we do expect that our laws are respected and abided by  and while we in the UK are fairly tolerant we can take exception when someone, perhaps mainly an America wants everyting to be just like it is in their own country.

It Americans wish everywhere to be America, then really they should stay in America which apparently many Americans do and are so unaware of what life is out of America and perhaps even their own State or in some perhaps rare instances their own backyard.

The America of today has since its inception around the 1600/1700s been somewhat of an isolationist country, unless it is the American government who appear to believe that they can instal America views and policies in any country of its choosing. Perhaps something like Putin in Russia, but that can’t be right for America is so against any forms of Communism or what they believe is Communism, but isn’t just Socalism where to some extent others are considered as well as themselves.

Perhaps this is why many Americans can’t understand the concept of the NHS.

The World is so different to how it is generally displayed by Hollywood, where in many instances they create the impression that America created everything, when in reality they either copied or stole what they say they created, thus giving many Americans a false understanding of what is true or not true.

I have not mentioned Trump as yet and really don’t wish to, but he is one who has problems understanding the truth and untruths, but has the ability to convince many people in America that his untruths are the truth. He has many other problems, much too many to mention and none of them make him great which he will never make America be.

So, Americans enjoy yourselves in America, but if you do go out of America, please don’t create problems and pains for others.

Source: American living in UK disgusted by portion sizes – and crumpets – Mirror Online

GoFundMe launched for Donald Trump’s ‘unjust’ $350m fine in civil fraud case


GoFundMe launched for Donald Trump’s ‘unjust’ $350m fine in civil fraud case – ‘I stand unwaveringly with President Donald Trump in the face of what I see as unprecedented and unfair treatment by certain judicial elements in New York,’ Elena Cardone wrote

============================================

Who is conning who for someone is?

Trump states he is a billionaire, so if he is why does he need funds, well we only have his word to some extent and that word appears to change with what areas of wealth he wishes to prove and to who.

He is also a serial non-payer to people and organisations who state he owes them money for various services rendered. He has also declared his businesses bankrupt around 6 times, so is that the actions of a good businessman, well perhaps not one you can trust.

However, his supporters appear to trust him and believe every word he speaks, well even that is ridiculous as who is correct every time?

That is what conmen do and how they keep being able to exist, until, of course, the legal processes catch up with them. Is this not what the legal process appears to be currently doing, well not according to Trump, but, if he is a conman then you would expect him to say that for that is what conmen do. They dupe those they speak to and he speaks to his supporters, well not really speak to, but delivers a sermon to them, just like many Evangelical preachers are said to do.

Now what a coincidence for the Evangelical Church also appears to support him. So is Trump conning the Evangelical Church or are they conning their congregations or perhaps both the Church and Trump are. Who knows but somewhere someone is conning someone.

Conmen usually just con individual people or groups of people, but, if Trump is a conman and has other disagreeable qualities he is conning a Country. Conning a country once is bad enough, but if it is more than once, what does it say about the country.

Source: GoFundMe launched for Donald Trump’s ‘unjust’ $350m fine in civil fraud case

What is Normal?


A good question and may be there are many answers.

So, firstly what are some definitions of ‘normal’

Merriam Webster

Defined as

normal

1 of 2

adjective

nor·​mal ˈnȯr-məl 

Synonyms of normal

1

a

conforming to a type, standard, or regular pattern characterized by that which is considered usual, typical, or routine

normal working hours

under normal circumstances

It was just a normal, average day.

He had a normal childhood.

Their reaction to the news was normal and expected.

The noise made it impossible to carry on a normal conversation.

Challenges are a normal part of life; remind yourself of that—and keep going.—Gabrielle Gayagoy

b

according with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, procedure, or principle

The normal spelling rule is “i before e, except after c.”

They filed the paperwork in the normal way.

The plane was able to make a normal approach and landing.

… is your home office either your principal place of work or a place where you meet with customers or clients in the normal course of business?—Rosalind Resnick and Susie Archer

2

occurring naturally

normal immunity

Cornell researchers showed that monarch butterflies that fed on leaves dusted with pollen from this [genetically] modified corn grew less and had higher mortality than larvae that fed on leaves dusted with normal pollen.—Russell Schoch

3

a

approximating the statistical average or norm

The west coast had normal rainfall for the season.

normal scores for the tenth grade algebra exam

a country’s normal death rate

Their insulin and blood sugar levels are within normal range.—Moises Velasquez-Manoff

b

generally free from physical or mental impairment or dysfunction exhibiting or marked by healthy or sound functioning

normal reflexes

Fifteen normal subjects and 40 asthmatics of variable severity were studied.—J. Bousquet et al.

However, my experience is that there are many, many normal people with no psychiatric illness who have music playing in their head almost all the time or all the time.—Keith W. Roach

c

not exhibiting defect or irregularity

normal and malignant cells

normal heart

d

within a range considered safe, healthy, or optimal

normal blood pressure

normal lab tests

Whereas Cambridge Dictionary

Defines as

Meaning of normal in English

normal

adjective

UK  /ˈnɔː.məl/ US  /ˈnɔːr.məl/

Add to word list 

A2

ordinary or usual; the same as would be expected:

a normal working day

Lively behaviour is normal for a four-year-old child.

It‘s normal for couples to argue now and then.

They were selling the goods at half the normal cost.

The temperature was above/below normal for the time of year.

Things are back to normal now that we’ve paid off all our debts. Thesaurus: synonyms, antonyms, and examples

normal

  • normalTemperatures are well above normal today.
  • usualI went to bed at my usual time.
  • ordinaryThe magazine has stories about ordinary people rather than celebrities.
  • standardIt’s standard practice for surgeons to wear gloves.
  • naturalIt’s completely natural to feel anxious on your first day at a new school.
  • typicalHe was a typical teenager – arguing with his parents and staying out late.

See more results » More examples SMART Vocabulary: related words and phrases

(Definition of normal from the Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge University Press)

normal | AMERICAN DICTIONARY

normal

adjective

US  /ˈnɔr·məl/

normal adjective (NOT UNUSUAL)

Add to word list 

ordinary or usual; as would be expected:

He seemed perfectly normal to me.

The temperature is above/below normal today.

normalization

noun [ U ] US/ˌnɔr·mə·ləˈzeɪ·ʃən, -lɑɪ-/

normal

noun [ C ]

US/ˈnɔr·məl/

normal noun [C] (LINE)

PHYSICS

line that is perpendicular (= at an angle of 90 degrees) to a surface

(Definition of normal from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary © Cambridge University Press)

normal | BUSINESS ENGLISH

normal

adjective

UK  /ˈnɔːməl/ US

Add to word list 

usual, and what you would expect:

They were selling the good at half the normal price.

In normal circumstances, you should be able to decide this sort of thing without consulting your manager.

It is normal practice to refer such questions to the Board.

The day after the incident, everyone was back at work as normal.

(Definition of normal from the Cambridge Business English Dictionary © Cambridge University Press)

EXAMPLES of normal

normal

Indeed, the cases cover all possible normal purely negative 2-programs without virtual constraints.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

This comment about ‘ returning to normal ageing ‘ is very interesting.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

After haemofiltration, which probably eliminated the excessive amount of triiodothyronine, cardiovascular as well as renal functions returned to normal.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

The dancers returned because they could use it as a tool to formulate body actions which were outside their normal performance routines.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

Therefore, by repeated application of the rules the input types are reduced to a normal form.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

We find s by reducing t to normal form.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

This was because of our discovery that in normal development, identical behaviour at two different ages could be sustained by very different underlying representations.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

In the model, word final stops and fricatives were given weaker representations in the normal case to reflect their lower salience.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

This case admits a specially simple normal form in which the low degree terms of the normal form can be replaced by coordinate functions.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

In five out of six fish, sensitivity recovered to normal.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

The author suggested that this animal might have recovered normal eye alignment.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

More recently the roles of specific genes in normal cardiogenesis been defined.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

In the normal study condition, participants were told to concentrate and remember as many words as possible.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

She is supposed to represent herself (and write representations of) normal ways of behaving and thinking.

From the Cambridge English Corpus

These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.

So you would expect ‘normal’ to be always the same in similar circumstances, but over time normal can and does change and this could be due to influencers. These days we may believe that influencers are someting new with regards to social media influencers, but in reality there have always been influencers with those with assumed power who others have believed they should follow.

Influencers tend to have some form of power and this could be the power of strength, wealth, popularity and many others. But all forms of life, not just human are unique. We may to some degrees look similar, but in everyone there will be some differences, so why do many of us wish to be ‘normal’.

In some respects we believe there is some safety in being seen as normal, as if you are seen as abnormal then you could be subjected to some forms of discrimination and abuse. But who is to say that normal is right and abnormal may be wrong. Well here you are the effect of numbers, as normal would have more persons than say abnormal. But is all abnormal persons came together then the numbers could be nearer.

In normal we are lead to believe that the majority is right and the minority is not, but why as we could all be wrong and the minority could be right and the majority be wrong, so the power of the majority overcome the some power of the minority.

To a large extent Society in its many forms are to blame for the continuance of normality, until Society itself changes then so do some areas of normality, but perhaps not all areas of normality.

The above is considering normal within the majority, but we as individuals also have our own normality, maybe our own routines, what we eat and drink, what we wear, what we think and others and when we are not connecting with the majority we could just follow our own normals within our own areas say home because without others seeing we feel safe to do so.

But normal can be defined in areas, of class, religion, race, gender, disability and others and in many of these there are many that can’t be changed. But say in religion and race, but also in the others there is a great degree of discrimination and abuse, when effectively we are all humans and being humans should be the collective ‘norm’.

In this comes prejudice and prejudice can be very wrong in many ways and leads to many acts of discrimination and acts of violence in many areas of the world. People are entitled to their views and should be allowed to have them, but these views should not lead to acts of discrimination and violence.

Even normality can lead to prejudice so we all need to be aware of differnce and accept that difference should be acceptable even if it is not within our views of normal.

Explorers of tme of old believed their views were normal and so they went into the assumed unkown to discovery more about the unknown. However, in doing so they went with their own views and prejudices and when they came across the natives of these lands they tried to convert these natives to conform to the views and prejudices of the respective explorers and if these natives objected then they were brushed aside by capture or being killed. Many of these explorers would have been Christians, but in the process of exploring they failed to live by Christian principles and made sure their norms were to be the way forward at many times by force. When Christ said spread the word I am sure not at the expense of peoples lives, but the norms of the explorers were so consumed in them and they had no wish for their norms to be challenged.

It beggars belief how this lead Christians to endorse slavery because that would have been against Christian principles, but to counter this they just accepted that these natives were not humans, even though they were and treated them as wild animals and so caged them as they did with the wild animals they came across. It was even wrong with regards the animals, let alone the natives they encountered.

But even to this day there are some forces in America, a supposed Christian country, who would and do wish to bring back slavery as though slavery wasn’t abolished.

But, slavery while the old forms of slavery was abolished, slavery is still around and now termed as modern slavery, but slavery was wrong years ago and so is modern slavery but in many instances is courted as normal by some.

When normal is being viewed great care has to be taken to ensure, normal doesn’t become unlawful for it is in some communities and countries.

Why can’t we dispense with normal and just accept what is there, provided it is lawful, as no one should dictate to others what normal is as normal should be an individual view and not Society’s.

Live and let live and respect human rights.

Portuguese man who has lived legally in UK since 2001 faces deportation | UK news | The Guardian


Lawyers and human rights campaigners say case shows Home Office’s increasingly hostile policy towards EU citizens

============================================

The system on the rights to live in the UK is seriously flawed as João Rocha Gonçalves Da Silva has created no problems during his legal stay in the UK from 2001.

While others who have been brought before UK courts on several charges appear to be allowed to stay just on their declaration that they have converted to Christianity.

Since when being a Christian is a reason to be allowed to stay in the UK. Our history and some of our legal rulings may be based on Christian principles, but even Christians are not guaranteed to be always lawful as we have seen in the past by some who are in the church, some priests, nuns, and others who have held Christian positions of office.

Sanity needs to prevail and in that, João Rocha Gonçalves Da Silva has done more than necessary to be allowed to stay in the UK. But is there sanity in the UK justice system, perhaps not, just Home Office decisions that have no reality to life in the UK.

Perhaps we should say the Home Office is not welcome in the UK.

Source: Portuguese man who has lived legally in UK since 2001 faces deportation | UK news | The Guardian

Iranian woman whipped 74 times for refusing to wear hijab


33-year-old was charged with ‘encouraging permissiveness’ after several Tehran outings

============================================

In Iran and some other countries, they have no understanding of what permissiveness is, but, what they do understand is the state of their men in that they have no idea how to respect women.

They believe that if a woman shows a bit of flesh then their men will just ravage her, unfortunately, it should be the men who are controlled and not the women.

Allow the women to rule and the men will learn their lesson.

Source: Iranian woman whipped 74 times for refusing to wear hijab

Israel has attacked targets in neighbouring countries. Isn’t that terrorism? | Vox Political


I was going to do an in-depth article on this, but then I realised that I don’t have to. If someone sets off a bomb, triggers a firearm or commits another act of violence, especially against …

============================================

It’s the old story what is done depends on who does and to whom in some it is seen as a defence of democracy, an attack of retaliation, an act of terrorism and others.

But any attack on another country is wrong whether who makes the first action, but in world affairs is appears there is a degree of wrong and then that decides how the action is viewed.

Attacks on other countries can be because of fears of being attacked, being attacked, greed, opposition to religion, race, cultures and others.

There is the UN who should be there to maintain peace, but countries tend to accept the UN when they agree with proposed actions and don’t accept the UN when they disagree and then there are the fence sitters who can’t decide if they agree or not.

That is not keeping the peace for there is no real punishment for going against the UN, so in effect the UN has very little real power, but costs to run, would we be better off without the UN or not. But the UN does do some charity work which should be good, but many times the conflicts that arise means the UN stop the charity work, when in effect it is even more needed.

But in all instances safety is the main consideration and in some instances that is why acts of violence occurs which seems like inconsistencies in world affairs.

All world leaders should be held to account and acts taken against them to ensure that they are, for it is seldom that the populations of countries which are the problem but the leaders of countries, but the leaders tend to survive in most instances while the populations are the ones that suffer most.

The power balances are all wrong and do need to be addressed, but how, now that is the question.

Source: Israel has attacked targets in neighbouring countries. Isn’t that terrorism? | Vox Political

Oscar Pistorius released on parole and at home 11 years after murdering Reeva Steenkamp – live | The Independent


Pistorius admitted to system of community corrections and is now at home

============================================

Much has already been said about the sentencing of Oscar Pistorius where the original sentence was way to short and was eventually lengthened on a prosecutors appeal, but even that was too short, just shows how murder is viewed in South Africa.

Originally he believed his fame and wealth would allow him to be acquitted, but sense prevailed and he was then found guilty.

Now, ‘“He has ticked all the necessary boxes,” said Themba Masango, secretary general of Not In My Name International, a group that campaigns against violence against women. “And we can only wish and hope Oscar Pistorius will come out a better human being.”

“We tend to forget that there is a possibility where somebody can be rehabilitated.”’

In some respects Themba may be correct, but I really do doubt that the attitude of Pistorius has really changed that much, if at all.

He is somewhat skilled in deception and his use of religion could have been his trump card.

Why do people believe that everyone who takes up religion are there always for good, for have we not seen many instances where belief in religion has been used for very bad means.

To this day you only have to view the religionist extremists in America for how religion can be used, but it is used in many other countries in not good ways, even the assumed Christian religion, but they are many forms of religion.

Religion should never be used for evil, but always for good, but some people’s good is bad for others, when this should never be.

For religion is a belief and should be a personal belief and not a means to indoctrinate others by whatever means available. By all means mention religion to others, but it is their life and not the lives of others, so if they wish to follow the belief so well and good, but if they don’t then that should also be expected and not used as a means to castigate them and pronounce them as non-believers.

They may not wish to believe in your religion, but will believe in something, even if it is to be in many ways not religious at all, for that should be their choice, their human right to do so and rights and people should always be respected.

So believing should be good, but not always as some do use religion to indicate they believe just as a means to deceive others. These are the most dangerous people for they are showing they are one, when in reality they are another and Pistorius could be also.

Watch his space, difficult when in his fathers walled home, but these days there are many means to escape walls, perhaps not in physical person, but certainly virtual person and with AI they could well be in disguise.

Source: Oscar Pistorius released on parole and at home 11 years after murdering Reeva Steenkamp – live | The Independent

Scots victims of Post Office Horizon scandal back calls to strip ex chief of top honour – Daily Record


The real victims of the scandal in Scotland called for justice as hit new mini series Mr Bates Vs The Post Office grips the country this week.

============================================

The have been many scandals over the years but the Post Office/Fujitsu scandal has to be rated very high, if not the highest. The scandal is not just the Post office, but Fujitsu as well if what has been shown in the programme is correct.

The article states, ‘The Post Office has said it is committed, along with the Government, to providing “full, fair and final compensation for victims”, saying it fully shares the aims of the public inquiry to “establish what went wrong in the past and the accountability for it”.

A Cabinet Office spokeswoman said it would be “inappropriate to comment” on any individual honours recipient.’

But we see that the Post Office wasn’t, but at least one MP appeared to be, but perhaps not the government and especially not the legal system.

As to Paula Vennells, it appears she can’t be trusted, but then who in business and government can be. So from how she is portrayed in the programme she will never voluntarily give up her CBE, for she appears to be all show and talk, but no action.

The powerful will always belittle those whom they feel they can and power does mean those being belittled will be reluctant to engage against the appeared powerful and that is why power is used against them. We see this very regularly in many areas, for power breeds contempt and disregard for others and it takes great courage for the belittled to even contemplate engaging let alone then engaging.

For, the powerful usually have some degree of wealth and are willing to use it and it appears on many occasions our legal system tends to favour the rich and powerful rather than those who aren’t.

It is clear that prosecutions have to be undertaken against many in the Post Office and Fujitsu and we regard to the Sub-postmasters who were prosecuted and even more so those found guilty, every case has to be looked at, even if those prosecuted have not currently asked for it to be done. Some proactivity is required and not solely reliant on reactivity.

The innocent should have been protected, but weren’t, while those apparently guilty being the Post office and Fujitsu were presumed from the outset to be innocent another relic of power and wealth, being the assumed standing in Society, which we have seen as false over the years.

Saville and Harris are just 2 examples where courage and relentless actions eventually ruled the day and made the Police and CPS need some investigation, whether any investigations have been it a matter for discussion.

All this proves that more equality is required in many areas of the UK, but will it ever be achieved, well not if the current authorities don’t change how they act.

There are too many scandals, financial, gender, sexual, racial and many more and none should have ever occurred but they have and still do, which indicates there are many areas of UK Society which are far from equal and that needs to change and change immediately.

Does power and wealth corrupt, or is the corruption there before, who will bother to find out.

 

 

Source: Scots victims of Post Office Horizon scandal back calls to strip ex chief of top honour – Daily Record

King Charles should follow Denmark’s example – and tell us when he’ll abdicate | Simon Jenkins | The Guardian


Queen Margrethe is the latest European monarch to make way for new blood. It puts our archaic system to shame, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins

============================================

The UK Monarchy and government are archaic and modernisation is long overdue.

Many say we need to keep the tradition, but even tradition can undergo some forms of modernisation. Charles has indicated he wishes to make the Monarchy smaller in size and should only include the monarch currently reigning at any time and their immediate successor and their family, all the others should be put to pasture.

As to the House of Lords, this is in many respects still a relic of the past and Hereditary Peers should be reduced even further or have none at all. The Christian Bishops are from when the UK in its past forms was viewed as being fully Christian and while Christianity may still be a majority, the existence of other religions should be recognised, or no entitlement for Religious members be included.

We are a multi-national and multi-religious country and so much the better for it and this needs to be recognised.

We were and continue to be formed by immigration and we need more not less to ensure we exist as a country. So more legal routes have to be formed and by this illegal migration will decrease.

We do have a lack of education and housing resources and in some instances, some of these are nowhere near the standards required, especially with housing, but this is not due to immigration but to lack of proper government both currently and over many years past.

Legal migration has to be welcomed or many areas of the UK structures will fail to exist, not only the NHS and social care but many more. Those who disagree will just have to live with it for need has to be the priority not outdated beliefs.

Source: King Charles should follow Denmark’s example – and tell us when he’ll abdicate | Simon Jenkins | The Guardian