‘They’re desperate and broken and need help — not just moving along to somewhere else’
============================================
To solve any problem the root cause has to be solved and if it isn’t then the problem will never be solved and will get worse.
Being homeless is the last rung of the Society ladder, well not because the last rung is death, however, homelessness is about the lowest one can get before death occurs.
Solve the root problem and the homeless and begging will be drastically reduced, but there will always be some element of it.
So, assuming a public space protection order (PSPO) comes into place ‘If the PSPO does come in, the people who will have to enforce it are the police and the City Centre Ambassadors. The consultation document says enforcement will “enhance and not work against” current harm reduction initiatives and will be used to identify and address the support needs of people breaching the PSPO. It adds that fixed penalty notices will be “used where appropriate” but will not be the default response. A helpful City Centre Ambassador tells me much of what the PSPO covers is already illegal, but that the order would give them new powers, meaning they could issue civil penalties themselves. If this is refused, they can then get the police involved. “The idea is that it is meant to be the council and police working together to enforce it,” he tells me. Is that something the City Centre Ambassadors support? “No comment,” he says.’
So, a fixed penalty notice could be issued or the person could move on, but move on to whereas moving on is not solving the problem but allowing it to reappear in another place. If a fixed penalty notice is issued to what avail as the person to whom it is issued will, more than likely not be able to pay the fine or to do so will require more begging. If police assistance is required where will the police assistance come from we already are aware there are insufficient police. Or there appears to be for in many instances when police are called no one comes at all or too late to be of assistance.
Homelessness in many instances is due to insufficiencies in Society or lack of financial resources so any accommodation is lost thus causing to be homeless. But it could be down to not being able to cope with all that is happening causing mental problems and then there is an insufficiency for the NHS to deal with mental stresses and the resulting outcomes. However, there is also an accommodation shortage and thus no accommodation for the homeless to move into assuming that they could afford to do so.
Therefore creating PSPO is dealing with one outcome, but in no way solving the initial problem.
In many respects funding is the main problem, insufficient funding for those who then become homeless, and insufficient funding for LAs to deal with the initial problems of insufficient housing. Then insufficient funding for the NHS to deal with any mental health issues which could have been the cause for being homeless.
Most of the funding is from the government which since 2010 has been inflicting austerity cuts on LAs so leaving them short of much finance to provide for adequate services to be in place in many different areas. The austerity cuts have not been reversed and now there is more likelihood for more funding cuts to LAs by this government or future governments.
It is arguable if before 2010 LAs were sufficiently funded.
On top of all that, there is substantial underfunding of the NHS and even greater insufficient funding for social care.
The costs of inflation may be being reduced but there is still inflation albeit at a lower rate and while some form of tax cuts are promised, no increase in the Tax Allowance levels is expected. This means the lowering of National Insurance rates means more taxable income is there as does anyone lucky enough to get salary increases, but all this means greater numbers are coming into areas of income being taxed, if already being taxed more income to be taxed on and if near a taxation band then moving into a higher rate taxation band. Additional revenues for the Chancellor while the Chancellor is indicating people are better off for he gives one inch in one hand and takes two or more inches away with the other.
If you are lucky to have more income or savings than you really need then you will be better off than those who don’t and those who don’t are more likely to be in greater numbers and in greater need than those who are seen to be better off. Also, those who are already suffering from a lack of finances will always be hurt more when living costs rise no matter what rate.
The homeless will always be the worse off and people with disabilities won’t be any better the welfare benefits that are supposed to be there to help the disabled to be more equal are also not sufficient as the costs related to being disabled are rising more than the benefits to offset the costs. Also, some of the benefits paid are also liable to be taxed, so an insufficient benefit could be made even lower by tax being deducted.
But it looks more than likely that PSPOs will be introduced while the government gets off apparently free from any criticisms.
Source: (3) Sheffield wants a continental style café culture. Is a public space protection order the answer?