Thousands died waiting for NHS funding decision

This is outrageous and I would have wished to know what the CCGs and CHC are doing about it.

I myself am not sure who is worse Adult Social Care or CHC as both are short of funding to provide care, but the funding aspect should not have any relationship to the process of assessing the care needs.

The funding for care needs to be urgently attended to, because the demand will continue to rise, due to persons living longer, persons withing longer with more disability needs due to the advances in medical science and the increasing population.

If care needs are not going to be available why go to the lengths in extending life.

Nobody cares especially this Government who are doing all they can to extend suffering and increasing the rate of death.

This they are doing by limiting funds for care and also restricting benefits for those who are in need.

If I did not know better I would assume that creating circumstances which increases the risk of death is in fact Government Policy.

In fact I do not know better so it could well be Government Policy, as if people do die there will be less requiring care and also benefits.

This could be classed as Governmental Euthanasia

Government takes small step over risk of NHS care home discrimination

It should be an individuals right to be able to live where they chose to and not where an authority states they should. Care is personal to the individual and should never be reduced in quality or quantity.

Long term care should not be metered by cost, but by individual need in accordance with their choice. Why should having a disability or a life long condition mean their choice cannot be respected.

Councils ‘levelling down’ care packages after ILF closure | Community Care

Report reveals more than half of local authorities in London have cut care packages since the closure of the Independent Living Fund in June last year

Source: Councils ‘levelling down’ care packages after ILF closure | Community Care