Scrap prison sentences for the non-payment of council tax, says think-tank : Welfare Weekly


Sending people to prison for the non-payment of council tax is “inhumane” and “ineffective” and should be scrapped, according to a new report from the Social Market Foundation think-tank.

The report, written by the respected lawyer Chris Daw QC, argues that England should follow the rest of the UK in ending prison terms for council tax debtors.

 

Source: Scrap prison sentences for the non-payment of council tax, says think-tank : Welfare Weekly

Universal Credit: a mum wins permission to fight DWP in court


Yet another problem with Universal Credit, why are there so many problems, are the Civil Servants who provide guidance to Ministers not up to the job, or is it Ministers ignoring the advise, or both? Will we ever know as no one is ever held accountable.

Accountability needs to be a priority as does Legislation to be drafted correctly and when problems do occur for these to be dealt with expeditiously so not to cause hardship on the vulnerable.

Sanctioned for not being able to sign on on bank holiday Monday. Tears, frustration and rain.


The poor side of life

Today’s demo started rather hurriedly and to be honest I didn’t know if I was coming or going. This feeling was amplified because it was cold, rainy and my daughter was a bit fed up. understandable of course. But she soon settled down into our usual routine and all was well.

img_2286

We are seeing a lot of new faces due to Stalybridge Jobcentre shutting. They don’t know us and what we are doing, and we don’t know them or their situations either. So we have to start from scratch, which at times isn’t easy.  But it’s a whole lot harder for them.

I started a conversation with a man who had been previously attending Stalybridge Jobcentre for his appointments. The first thing that he said to me was that he couldn’t believe how rude the front desk staff are at  Ashton Jobcentre, and how rude some of the advisors are also…

View original post 1,606 more words

Republican contradictions abound in the age of Trump – The Washington Post


With the election of Donald Trump, Republicans will need to face up to a series of contradictions that will strike at the heart of right-wing orthodoxy. Trump has not yet taken office, but Republicans’ intellectual coherence is already at the breaking point.

Trump’s frail ego demands that Republicans deny Russian espionage. (They’d do well to listen to Robert Gates, who explained that “it clearly was aimed at discrediting our elections and I think it was aimed certainly at weakening Mrs. [Hillary] Clinton.”) Now Republicans will have to decide whether the party of Trump believes in a strong national security or in protecting Trump from hurt feelings.

Trump’s desire to “make deals” and bully individual companies has already undercut the Republican belief in the free marketplace and the party’s aversion to government picking “winners and losers.”

Source: Republican contradictions abound in the age of Trump – The Washington Post

“These are the challenges Labour faces” –  Iain McNicol – Labour’s General Secretary | LabourList


Tory Britain!

When I was elected to the post of General Secretary in 2011, one of my top priorities was to finish the process of paying off the £24.5m debt the Labour Party had built up after the 2005 general election, work my predecessor Ray Collins had already made real progress on. It was essential we became an organisation that could live within our means.  Over the last few years we have had to take some tough decisions and make some difficult choices, but we have now paid off the last of our loans and achieved our goal. This is a huge accomplishment for the organisation and means that the Labour Party can now move forward, away from the cloud of debt that has been hanging over us for so many years. It also means we are now in a stronger position to make some long term financial decisions. So this week…

View original post 44 more words

NHS in financial crisis after posting £1 billion losses in just three months


Original post from The Independent

‘…………..By Matt Dathan

Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP/Getty Images
Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt JUSTIN TALLIS/AFP/Getty Images

The NHS is in its “worst” financial position in a generation after building up debts of nearly £1bn in just three months, regulators have said.

Figures for the first three months of the financial year show NHS Foundation Trusts in England had a deficit of £445 million, while other NHS trusts racked up a £485 million deficit in the same period.

Labour accused Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary, of delaying the release of the statistics to avoid the Conservative party conference earlier this week being overshadowed by talk of the NHS “in crisis”.

One of the main reasons for the overspend was higher than expected costs for staff pay, with regulators finding an “over-reliance” on costly agency staff.

The figures come from two reports – financial regulator Monitor covered 151 NHS Foundation Trusts, while the Trust Development Authority (TDA) covers 90 NHS trusts.

Of those 90 trusts, 72 ended the first three months of the financial year in the red, while eight out of ten Foundation Trusts were found to be running a deficit by the end of the first quarter.

Monitor said the Foundation Trust sector is “under massive pressure” and can no longer to go on as it is.

The release of the figures on Friday come after Mr Hunt was accused of delaying the publication of the statistics until after the Conservative party conference.

A senior figure at Monitor said they had been “leaned on” by Whitehall to delay publication until after the Tory party conference in Manchester earlier this week.

The quarterly report by Monitor and the TDA are usually published shortly after the organisations’ board meetings at the end of the month, while hospital trusts sent their records to the two regulatory bodies two months ago.

Labour’s shadow Health Secretary Heidi Alexander said the actions taken by Conservative ministers were to blame for the debts. “It is now clear why these figures weren’t released ahead of Tory party conference – they show an NHS in crisis,” she said.

“The alarming deterioration in NHS finances is a direct result of actions this Government has taken.

“Cuts to nurse training places has left the NHS with a shortage of nurses, forcing hospitals to hire expensive agency staff. As Monitor acknowledges, this is the primary cause of the deficit.

“With a difficult winter approaching hospitals are facing a stark choice between balancing the books and delivering safe care.

“Ministers might be in denial, but the fact that in the first three months of this year, NHS trusts are facing a bigger financial hole than that which built up over the whole of last year is a clear sign of how desperate the funding situation has now become.”

Greece’s Groundhog Day may be giving way to Judgment Day


Original post from Washington Post

‘…………


The IMF could have handled its 2010 bailout of Greece quite a bit better, a staff review found. (AFP PHOTO / LOUISA GOULIAMAKILOUISA)

Okay, campers, rise and shine, and don’t forget your booties because it’s cold out there between Greece and Europe. It’s cold out there every day. Greece is tired of being told what to do, and Europe is tired of giving money to a country that won’t do as it’s told.

If that sounds like the same story you’ve been hearing for five years now, well, you’re right. It’s a financial Groundhog Day that not only threatens to kick Greece out of the eurozone, but also kick out others if the panic spreads. The problem is that even though both sides want a deal, neither wants the other to be able to say that they got the better of it. Specifically, Greece’s new ruling party, Syriza, wants to be able to show that confrontation has worked, but Europe doesn’t want other countries to think that’s the way to get what they want.

And so on and on it’s gone—until now maybe. Not because Europe and Greece are closer to agreement, but because they’re not. After all these years, Greece doesn’t really think Europe would hit the eject button on it, but, at this point, Europe doesn’t think anyone but Greece would get hurt if it did.

The eurozone’s Groundhog Day, in other words, might be giving way to its Judgment Day.

Up until now, it’d been hard for them to do that. Greece needed Europe’s money, and Europe needed to keep Greece in the euro. Neither side liked where that left them, but they didn’t have many choices. Now, Greece could have defaulted and devalued, but that would have not only meant leaving the euro, which its people didn’t want, but also even worse austerity in the short-term than it was already doing. That’s because Greece’s deficit not including its interest payments was so big that even if it didn’t have any interest payments to make—that is, it defaulted on its debt—then, because it would have had to balance its budget overnight, it would have had to cut more spending than it did as part of its bailout. Europe, meanwhile, could have let Greece go bust, but that could have brought down the French and German banks that had lent to it—and who knows how many others—and made markets worry that other countries would be next.

So what has changed? Well, for one, Greece has gone through a Great Depression that has made its economy shrink 25 percent and its budget cuts self-defeating. Consider this: since 2008, Greece’s debt burden has grown more because its smaller economy means it has less ability to pay, not because its bigger debt means it has more to pay. That’s made the Greek government finally say enough. Enough austerity that’s made it harder to grow and impossible to pay back what we owe. And enough telling us how to run our economy. It’s as much about reclaiming a sense of sovereignty as anything else. The only upside to all this austerity is that, before this latest flare-up, it had pushed Greece’s budget into the black if you ignored its debt payments. That meant if it did default and exit the euro, Greece might not have to do more austerity than it’s already doing (although the tricky thing is that this would hurt its economy enough in the short-term that its surplus would turn to a deficit). In any case, Greece thought this made their threats to leave the euro more credible—which, assuming Europe would do anything to avoid that, would give Greece more power at the negotiating table.

That might not be a safe assumption. That’s because it might not be the end of the world if Greece defaulted now, and it might not even be the end of Greece’s euro membership. Instead, it could put capital controls in place—preventing people from pulling their money out of the country—and continue as a once and future part of the euro, like Cyprus has. But even if it didn’t, it wouldn’t be as catastrophic as it would have been a few years ago. Greece’s first bailout paid off most of its private creditors, those French and German banks, so there wouldn’t be the same kind of financial contagion now as before. There might not be any kind of contagion at all. The European Central Bank has promised to buy a country’s bonds in unlimited amounts if necessary, and has already started buying €60 billion a month for the eurozone as a whole. That, in theory, should keep other country’s borrowing costs from spiraling up in a self-fulfilling cycle of doom if Greece goes bust.

That’s set up a showdown both sides think they can win over Greece’s budget, Greece’s debt, and Greece’s labor laws. It’s pretty simple. Greece doesn’t want to have to do any more austerity—especially when it comes to its pensions—it wants its debt to be written down, and it doesn’t want to change its laws to make it easier to fire people. Europe, for the most part, wants the opposite. Now, it’s true that Europe has been willing to offer Greece a little wiggle room on its budget targets, but that’s about the least it can do. It’s just acknowledging economic reality. That’s because every 1 percent of gross domestic product of cuts costs Greece, as Paul Krugman points out, more than twice that much in GDP itself.

Other than that, though, Europe has been holding the line. It doesn’t want to give Greece money without feeling like it’s getting something in return, and that something is bringing Greece’s rules in line with Germany’s. That means cutting Greece’s pensions even more. It means getting rid of Greece’s labor laws that protect people who already have jobs at the expense of people who are looking for them. And it means selling off assets that the state doesn’t need to own. Greece’s response is that it’s already cut its pensions quite a bit(even if they’re still pretty generous), and it’s up to them to decide what the right rules are for its labor markets. And Greece says that forcing it to sell things, like the Piraeus Port, will only make it sell them at fire sale prices, transferring public wealth into private hands at below-market prices. But more than that, Greece is saying that it can’t do this politically. Maybe that’s just a negotiating tactic, but maybe it’s not. Syriza’s far-left members don’t want to be the party of less austerity. They want to be the party of noausterity. And that’s why Syriza has backtracked on reforms that previous Greek governments had made by, for example, rehiring thousands of government workers.

Now anytime you read a headline about Greece, you should remember that there’s not going to be a deal until the last minute. The question, though, is whether there will be one after it. European officials, for their part, don’t sound so optimistic now, but then again, why would you expect them to say anything else? It’s all about putting pressure on the other side to give in before the deadline at the end of the month. And not just with words, but with carrots and sticks. Europe’s been pretty clever about those, what good it’s done. The first is the European Central Bank’s bond-buying program. The rules it’s given itself prevent it from buying Greece’s bonds until or unless Greece pays the ECB back some of what it already owes. And the second is the new bailout Europe is proposing. The money would come from the money they’d already set aside, but haven’t used yet, for recapitalizing Greece’s banks. The catch? Every day there isn’t a deal, Greece’s slow-mo bank run, a jog, really, gets a little worse—people don’t want their euros to turn into drachmas if Greece does leave the euro—and there’s less money in the bailout fund for bailing out anything other than the banks. The message is clear: take the money now so you can pay back what you owe, or wait and have less money.

Will this work? Probably. But for the first time in a long time, there’s a chance that this bailout dance, where each side ritually denounces the other before agreeing to some kind of fudge, has reached its end. You might miss Groundhog Day when it ends.

Matt O’Brien is a reporter for Wonkblog covering economic affairs. He was previously a senior associate editor at The Atlantic.  ……’

a