NHS Changing Places Template


I support this as there is a major shortage of Changing Places toilets, especially at hospitals.

People without disabilities take it for granted that toilet facilities will be available wherever they go and this may be so for disabled toilets, but quality will be a factor.

But with Changing Places this is far from the case, and if they are not available this is a major restriction on the freedoms of persons who really need them.

For when you want to go, then you want to go, but if the right facilities are not there then what can you do, for you still need to go.

A Wheelie Great Adventure

According to Government figures, fewer than 40 hospitals in England have a registered Changing Place facility. The reality of this situation is that disabled children, teenagers and adults have no safe toilet to use when attending hospital appointments or when visiting friends and family in hospitals.

Disabled people, and their carers, are being put at risk, due to manual moving and handling techniques being used without appropriate equipment. Disabled people are being put at risk of pressure ulcers due to being sat in soiled pads for prolonged periods of time. All of this while in a hospital setting, in outpatient departments, clinic departments and for anyone just wanting to visit their loved ones.

The Department of Health in England have made available 2 million pounds to provide Changing Places toilets in acute hospital settings. Hospital Trusts do need to apply.

Below is a template to use, in order to request…

View original post 176 more words

Grammar school plans ‘ignore impact on disabled pupils’ | DisabledGo News and Blog


The government failed to take any account of the impact on disabled pupils of its “discriminatory” plans to expand grammar schools in England, say campaigners. A government consultation paper published this week, Schools That Work For Everyone, includes plans to remove the ban on opening new grammar schools in England. But there is not a single mention of disabled pupils in the consultation paper, and the Department for Education (DfE) has failed to carry out an equality impact assessment of its proposals. Inclusive education campaigners say that expanding grammar schools – secondary schools which select pupils via an entrance test – will discriminate against disabled children and lead to more segregated education in special schools. And they say the plans are a clear breach of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, with new UN guidance making it clear that all segregated education should end and be replaced by “inclusive classroom teaching in accessible learning

Source: Grammar school plans ‘ignore impact on disabled pupils’ | DisabledGo News and Blog

Damning report finds social work regulation ‘not fit for purpose’


Original post from Community Care

‘…………….by

Overseeing body, the Professional Standards Authority, described the current regulatory system as outdated and incoherent

PSA: 'iron cage' of regulation needs rethinking. Photo: waferboard/ flickr
PSA: ‘iron cage’ of regulation needs rethinking. Photo: waferboard/ flickr

Social work regulation needs a “radical overhaul”, according to the Professional Standards Authority, in a hard-hitting report which questioned whether the current system was fit for purpose.

Frightened into compliance

In a report published last week, the overseeing body said regulation which attempts to “frighten [registrants] into resentful compliance” is to the detriment of performance.

Rather than inflexible and punitive regulation, which stopped practitioners from being innovative, there should be a greater focus on how regulators can support registrants’ professionalism and prevent them from being overburdened with rules and guidance, the report said.

It added the idea that risk of harm can be totally eliminated threatens to corrode the public trust in professionals and in regulation itself.

“All health and care interventions have an element of risk which cannot be totally eliminated,” the PSA pointed out.

Mission creep

“Too often we have seen examples of regulatory mission creep, where regulators have sought to expand the boundaries of their activity in ways that have resulted in confusion for the public and internal conflict of interest.”

This “creep” was flagged up by the Law Commission in a report last year, in which it was suggested the HCPC was breaching registrants’ human right to a private life.

“Registrants’ careers and lives, and those of their families, can often be seriously and lastingly damaged too, sometimes by [registrants’] words or actions lasting no more than a few moments,” the PSA report said.

The PSA also concluded that a “proliferation of regulatory organisations inevitably impedes the pace of change and improvement across the sector. It also embeds operational inefficiency and unnecessary expense.”

Fragmented system

Instead of the current fragmented system, there should be shared objectives between professional and systems regulators, the report recommended.

The Health and Care Professions Council which regulates social workers, and Ofsted which regulates the authorities that employ them, should share data and intelligence.

There are more than 20 different regulatory bodies and 12 professional regulators for health, care and social work in the UK. The report said this “vastly complicated and incoherent” regulator system existed despite a lack of understanding of the benefits of regulation and its influence on registrants behaviour.

Next steps

The PSA proposed several steps that should be taken to improve regulation:

  • A shared “theory of regulation” across the sector
  • Shared objectives for system and professional regulators, and greater clarity on respective roles and duties
  • Transparent benchmarking to set standards
  • A reduced scope of regulation so it focuses on what works
  • A proper risk assessment model for who and what should be regulated put into practice

A PSA spokesman said the report had been distributed widely and it was hoped it would stimulate discussion about what the next steps should be.      ………………’