An interview with the leader of Britain’s Labour Party
============================================
Yes, a good question, ‘What does Sir Keir Starmer stand for, but what is the answer and will we ever find out?
From what I see and hear, I very much doubt we will, for I believe he is just much of the same, just in a Party of a different colour, but still ‘pulling the wool’ over the eyes of the UK population.
An extract from the article introduction is ‘The second element is an embrace of what Janet Yellen, the American treasury secretary, calls “modern supply-side economics”. To improve living standards and fund public services, Britain’s productivity crisis needs to be turned around through planning reform, fixing health care and child care, and an interventionist industrial strategy. Combined, it’s a very tall order.’
Yes, that is good as far as it goes, but it does need to go much further, but will it?
We need an education system that is fit for the 21st and leading into the 22nd century, for currently, in many respects it is stuck in the 18th and 19th centuries. Yes, we need to educate children for further education after leaving school, but currently this is purely focused on pushing children through exams, which in many respects only provides for going to University and then not really fully. But it does not educate children for life outside of organised education, the education to live.
Many children in schools will never go to university, even if they really wish to, for many don’t, but the education system just passes them by. The system is geared, mainly to teach all in a similar nature, when, in fact, all children are not similar, as there are many varying degrees of difference and the system should be able to adapt to children and not children adapt to the system.
But, systems rule the UK and in fact many other countries, for systems exist wherever you go and they all, mostly, are totally inflexible and therefore don’t take into account the many varying differences in everyone. To be accountable to all every system needs to be flexible and continue to be flexible.
Yes, living standards for many have to be improved for no one in the UK should be in a place where they can’t afford to live. This means the UK welfare benefit systems have to be there to ensure everyone can live, therefore they should not be there to penalise, which in many instances they do today. Going through the processes it comes across that the processes are there to ‘catch you out’ rather than there to provide a means of help. Yes, there has to be means to reduce fraud, but is it really as serious as is made out and if it is just shows that the criminals are more intelligent than those creating the systems. But the criminals are in a very small minority, but everyone is penalised for this minority.
The levels of welfare benefit have to be improved so that people in receipt of them can afford to live. We have the National Living Wage, which in reality is not a living wage, but welfare benefits are way short of the National Living Wage. Then, if it is a living wage, why is it taxable, for any deductions, by the name makes it not a living wage. So the basic tax-free income level needs to be increased to the National Living Wage and this has not been increase since 2021, which is a disgrace. Also, all tax thresholds need to be increased, with maybe at least another tax rate of around 47% on income over £500,000. Yes, this is going to be expensive, but including a new tax band would cover some of the expense and I also I do agree with getting rid of the Non-dom tax status. But also, ensure all are paying their taxes and this includes all multi-national organisations and the Rich.
There was mention of fixing Health care and child care, but, no mention of fixing social care, for while health and child care does need fixing so does all social care for both children and all adults and this is so very urgently required, for it has been ‘kicked down the road’ for too many years and is now in a very serious state and if not fully funded so very soon could, to all intents and purposes disappear for ever. Unfortunately many, even in government believe that social care is just for the elderly, which it is not. It is surprising it has already not already disappeared, but for many it already as. Family carers have been doing all they can to counter the effects of lack of social care, to an extent saving the UK in 2021 £193 billion up from £132 in 2015.
In doing so the health of family carers has also deteriorated and in doing so, more is needed, not only for whom they care for, but also family carers themselves. For while caring, the health of themselves as family carers is not that what they look after, for concentrating on caring for their relatives is their main concern.
Any lack of social care has many effects on the NHS and to a large extent, is one of the major reasons of the crisis in the NHS and is so responsible for much of the health crisis. If social care is not dealt with quickly then we will not only be saying goodbye to social care, but to a major extent, much of the NHS.
Much of social care is funded through Local Authorities (LAs) as are many other essential services and yes, social care is a very essential service, but not viewed as such. This is down to the complete lack of any government interventions, not only by this government, but all previous governments. With all the banter from Sir Keir Starmer MP not once have I heard from him or any of his Shadow ministers, especially so the shadow health and Social Minister Wes Streeting MP, any mention of Social Care, especially the funding of, not that much different from the Health and Social Care Minister Steve Barclay MP.
For social care alone there is urgent need of funding of around £12 billion and then continued, sustainable funding for many years to come, along with the additional funding for the NHS.
But, LAs have been subjected to, from 2010 severe austerity cuts from Tory governments, which has left LAs in serious loss of funding to fund any essential services they are responsible for, let alone social care. But in this funding the pay rates for care workers need to be considerably increased to around £14.00 per hour, so much more than the current National Living Wage of £10.42 and then only if they are 23 years and over.
But that is not all for care workers need full recognition of all Bank holidays, expenses to cover all travelling expenses, good sick pay and much more. Unfortunately they are classed as being unskilled, which is way incorrect for to do care work to the required standards they have to be very skilled. There are many elements to caring and it is not just, washing and dressing, toileting and meal preparations, but so much more. The needs and choices of all in receipt of care need to be accounted for, then providing emotional support as and when needed, to understand who they are caring for and respect them in all instances and so much more. All of that requires many skills, in many respects many similar to those of nurses, so their pay rates should be much nearer to nurses than they are at present.
But in the NHS all pay rates, with perhaps the exception of those of Consultants, senior manages and Chief Executives need to be increased much more than currently. To not do so as with care workers people will leave and no one will wish to replace them. Some will say recruit from outside the UK, but of those who do come, well short of the real numbers required, don’t stay and just use the training and experience to gain much better paid and much better working conditions away from the UK.
We need to retain all who come into the NHS and social care and that means much increased pay rates and so much better working conditions.
All of the above I very much doubt Sir Keir Starmer will do, is it ignorance or is it much of the same as with the Tory’s a good deal of not really caring. Respecting Human Rights and concerns for safeguarding are not being considered.
Source: Sir Keir Starmer on “Starmerism” | The Economist
Like this:
Like Loading...