Archives for posts with tag: trains

I can see why Shadow fire minister Chris Williamson has broached this subject, but in civilised Society this is surely stating that Society is breaking down.

Yes, British Railways did have women only carriages prior to 1977, but these were a throwback to the past, some 132 years earlier. In those days rail travel was not as extensive as it is today and these carriages did not have corridors, so once in them, there you stayed until you arrived at your destination, no facilities for movement on long journeys or refreshment breaks.

This implies that ladies traveling alone are the only ones at risk as this could occur when ladies are accompanied by other persons, as is evident from a lady out with her boyfriend last week on an Italian beach, where she was gang raped in front of her boyfriend.

Surely, the whole concept is to make travel safe for us all and not a stated section, for if this came to pass, what carriages next, white and non white and so on.

With the advent of technology, surely there are other ways to provide safety, being cameras, etc.

The attacks on ladies or anyone else needs to be addressed, but by the rule of law and if, these attacks are being carried out by non-British residents, then these people need to be escorted out of the UK.

There are reports that some of these attacks are by Muslim males and that may be so, but not all of them are and until the statistics are released no one knows how many are. You cannot just rely on what is published on the various news media, as they only publish what they wish to publish, so they can slant the issue which way they want to.

Our UK laws are our laws and all who come or/and reside in the UK have to abide with them and if not they suffer the consequences.

Ladies only train carriages are not the way.

The Muslim Issue

This is how insane these left-wingers are. Punish the women, not the perpetrators. Put a bandaid on the problem and cover it up rather than deal with it. Isolate the women from society by building walls around them and restric their freedom, rather than dealing with medieval male misogyny against women. This is exactly the mindset behind Sharia. Maybe the MP should convert?

Why doesn’t he come out and tell the truth: The truth being that sex abuse in Britain is increasing rapdily due to EU’s open border policy and mass migration from non-European countries – Islamic countries in particular? If sex attacks are more prevalent amongst muslims from around the world, then what is wrong with their “culture”, religion and mindset? Why can’t he tell the truth and tackle the problem by banning Islam, where sex attacks and murder of women and children is completely legal?




View original post 860 more words


Here is a link to the full film that appeared on the Victoria Derbyshire Show, a couple of days ago. Please watch and share x

Source: Petition update · Changing Places toilets on Victoria Derbyshire Show ·

It is reported that plans for a ‘toxin tax’, after repeated calls for a diesel scrappage scheme, will be unveiled to crack down on air pollution

Source: If you drive a diesel car you could soon have to pay up to £20 a DAY – Daily Record

By Raya Al Jadir Young disabled people have been abused, threatened and left stranded while using public transport, according to a new report. End Of The Line 2016 follows a nine-month undercover investigation by Trailblazers – a network of 700 young disabled campaigners and their supporters that is run by the charity Muscular Dystrophy UK – and a survey of more than 100 of its members. It comes seven years after a previous report on access to public transport by Trailblazers, and concludes that although “things have improved significantly” there are still “huge strides to be made”, mostly because of a lack of funding and the negative attitudes of transport staff. One disabled passenger was even hospitalised because of a bus’s dangerous design, while others faced abuse and threats from both transport staff and other passengers. The report reveals the “disturbing experiences” of Trailblazers across buses, trains, taxis and London’s tube network, and concludes that their journeys are

Source: Abused, threatened and left stranded – young campaigners’ transport experiences | DisabledGo News and Blog

By Raya Al Jadir Disabled transport campaigners have called on three train companies to remove blanket bans that prevent all scooter-users from using their services. To mark the campaign, members of the user-led campaigning organisation Transport for All (TfA) took part on Tuesday in a musical conga through Victoria station in London. They presented a letter to a manager of Gatwick Express, which does not allow any scooters onto its older 442-type trains* – because of its single doors and narrower ramps – unless they can be folded up and taken on as hand-luggage. The action was led by scooter-user Gina Vettese, who is taking legal action against another rail company, Northern Rail, over its blanket ban, following an incident as she returned from a trip to visit her family in Morecambe last Christmas. Vettese faced few problems on the journey to Morecambe from Lancaster, but on the return trip she was told she would not be allowed on the train unless she folded her scooter and carried

Source: Blanket scooter bans on trains must end, say conga-dancing campaigners | DisabledGo News and Blog

Original post from Disabled Go News



Some disabled people have been “let down” by the Equality Act when it comes to access to public transport, a disabled campaigner has told members of the House of Lords.aigning organisation Transport for All, told peers that wheelchair-users were often “helpless” in trying to access wheelchair spaces on buses when they find them occupied by pushchairs or non-disabled passengers.

She said that many members of Transport for All had “given up the struggle” and no longer access transport because it was “too great a risk”.

She told the committee examining the impact of the Equality Act 2010 on disabled people that she had once been refused access to buses four times in one week because there were pushchairs in the wheelchair space.

Pedler said: “Everyone takes possession of our wheelchair space. That’s the greatest problem. We are helpless to get this put right. It happens all the time.”

She added: “I am talking as a disabled person. I haven’t got fine words for you. I am talking to you as I experience it, along with all the other members in Transport for All.”

Told by Graham Pendlebury, the Department for Transport’s director of local transport, that the bus industry had made progress in providing accessible vehicles, she said: “I don’t argue that these buses are accessible, but if we cannot get on them and we cannot access the pavements because they are too dangerous for us, having access is of little importance to us.

“Progress has certainly slowed – this is the opinion of Transport for All – since the Equality Act.”

The disabled crossbench peer Baroness [Jane] Campbell asked the three-person panel whether it was fair that disabled passengers had to phone up 24 hours in advance when they wanted assistance to use a train.

She said: “This is the blight of disabled people’s lives, that they cannot be spontaneous.”

Pedler said that TFA saw the requirement for disabled people to book assistance 24 hours in advance of a train journey as a “great injustice”, while some companies asked for 48 hours’ notice.

She said: “It stops us from being flexible. We can’t change our mind and go out to lunch with a friend. It takes away our independence and our freedom of choice.”

And she said she had often been unable to board a train even after booking assistance in advance.

Keith Richards, chair of the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee, said having to give notice two days in advance was “not equality”, and that it should be possible to send a text or use a smartphone app just a couple of hours beforehand to alert the relevant rail operator.

Pedler also told the committee that the Liberal Democrat transport minister Norman Baker had promised five years ago that laws on access to taxis, originally included 20 years ago in the Disability Discrimination Act – and later in section 165 of the Equality Act 2010 – would be implemented, but the promise was “taking a very long time to come to fruition”.

Richards said it made “absolute sense” for section 165 to be implemented.

He said: “There are many, many stories that we hear of people who are charged extra, who aren’t assisted or who aren’t even provided with the service because the taxi-driver will see them in advance and drive somewhere else. That is completely unacceptable.”

Pendlebury told the committee there were “a number of reasons” why section 165 had not yet been implemented, and he said it was “under constant review”.

He said: “The concerns were around burdens on drivers and whether this particular provision would actually fully meet the varied needs of different types of disabled people.

“I don’t believe that taxi-drivers or minicab drivers are bad people and threatening them with enforcement and fines – whether that is the right way to bring about a change in procedure.

“I think that government is keen to try to avoid a very heavy-handed implementation and to make sure that enforcement is a last resort.”

But he added: “Clearly we have seen much evidence about how catastrophic it can be for people when they are either mistreated in this way or denied access.”

Baroness Deech, the crossbench peer who chairs the committee, said it had been the “will of parliament” that section 165 should be introduced.

She said: “The burden is now being borne by those people who need those taxis and can’t get them. There can be no questioning of this.”

She added: “I still haven’t heard a decent reason why section 165 should not be brought into effect, so we note that.”

And she asked Pendlebury to ask his minister to write to the committee to explain why section 165 had not yet been implemented and when that would happen.

Baroness Campbell asked Pendlebury to show the committee the research on which the government had based its position that implementing section 165 could be a “burden” on drivers.

News provided by John Pring at


Hi I’m Aden, I work at DisabledGo as the Digital Marketing Manager and I manage the blog and all social media channels.

More posts from author        ……………….’

SouL SpeakS

He started Writing, The paper started speaking...

Letters of hope from the soul

I'm a sinner saved by Christ and I struggle. This is simply a blog about the struggle that I have. I am hoping it will someday be a blog about how I overcame my struggle with depression and suicidal ideation. (Cause if not that's gonna suck.)

Special Needs Siblings

Together Is All We Need

Live in Victory & Abundance

"Start Winning in your Today."

Govt Newspeak

Just a pleb exposing the cruelty of Neoliberal Governments

Recoup and Conquer

How to stretch a dollar, travel, and more

LD Carers Butty Group

A support group for carers of persons with Learning Disabilities and/or Autism in Sheffield UK

Life Plan

Make Some History

The Godly Chic Diaries

Smiling • Writing • Dreaming

Life with a Bear

Special needs, Complex needs, Non-verbal, wouldn't have him any other way!

Barbra Dozier's Blog

Just another weblog

Charlene Bullard

Believer, Mother, Educator, & Writer

%d bloggers like this: